One thing that the interviewer said at the beginning of the show that I appreciated was he noticed from reading my new book that there were new arguments against pretribulationism that he had never seen before. Exactly.
Going deep to the very foundations of pretribulationism resulted in new argumentation. In addition, I was able to argue in such a fashion that prevents posttribulationists to argue the way I did because they have similar misunderstandings (e.g. both pretrib and posttrib assume that the second coming begins with the battle of Armageddon).
Here is the interview.
Get the book here!
